★Residential · Service

Multi-room video · Kansas City.

Every source in one rack, any of them on any screen. IntegrateIT designs and installs whole-home video distribution across the Kansas City metro from Overland Park, Kansas. Every source lives in one central rack. A video matrix routes any source to any TV, so cable plays in the bedroom while an Apple TV runs in the kitchen, all in 4K HDR and all controlled from the same interface that runs the rest of the house. No cable box or streaming stick behind each screen, no clutter, one remote or app for everything. Phone: (913) 804-7575 or office@integrateit.tech.

Below: whether you need a matrix at all now that every television has apps on it, the three transports and what each one is betting on, the handshake problem that causes almost every black screen, what long runs and old houses change, why the audio is the half people forget, and where the rack should live.

First, whether you need one

Distributed video used to sell itself. One cable box instead of six, one subscription instead of six, and a rack instead of a shelf of equipment under every television. Two of those three arguments have weakened: the apps moved onto the displays, and a streaming device costs less than the cable that would carry its picture across the house. So we start this conversation by asking whether a matrix is the right purchase at all, which is not a question a company selling matrices is supposed to ask.

Distribution still wins, decisively, in four situations. When the sources are not apps — a cable or satellite subscription you do not want to buy five times, a media server, a camera system you want on any screen, a golf simulator you want spectators to watch from the bar. When the room design forbids equipment near the display, which is a millwork decision rather than a budget one and the same architecture behind concealed displays. When the house has enough screens that servicing them individually becomes a standing chore. And when the owner wants one interface, so a guest can turn on any television in the house and get something watchable without a lesson.

If none of those apply, we will say so and put the money somewhere it does more good — usually the network, or the audio. If several apply, the rest of this page is the design conversation.

Three transports, three different bets

• The HDMI matrix. A fixed box with inputs on one side and outputs on the other, feeding displays over HDMI. Simplest, cheapest, fewest failure points. Trade-off: HDMI over copper does not travel far at full bandwidth, and the box has a fixed size — the day you want a ninth display on an eight-output matrix, you buy a matrix. Right for compact houses with short runs and a settled display count.
• HDBaseT. The signal leaves the matrix on a single structured cable to a small receiver behind each display, which is what makes real house-sized runs practical, and control and power ride the same cable. Trade-off: still a fixed-size matrix, and each display needs its own receiver hidden behind it. This is the workhorse tier and where this work lands.
• AVoIP. Encoders and decoders on a dedicated network switch instead of a matrix. The system expands within the platform, switch, bandwidth and endpoint limits rather than stopping at a chassis size, adding a display is adding a decoder, and the same architecture drives video walls and multi-view. Trade-off: the network is now part of the AV system, which means a properly specified switch, dedicated capacity, and someone who will own it — not the modem the internet provider left in the basement. Right for large homes and for anything that will keep growing.

We carry and install AVPro Edge and Blustream for the switching and extension hardware — their product families, and how we choose between them on a given house, are on those two pages — and the network under an AVoIP system is designed as part of the same project rather than inherited — the same structured Ubiquiti network we would build anyway, sized for the video.

The handshake is what actually breaks

The failure people describe as a broken television is nearly always a negotiation failure. Every link in an HDMI chain has to agree on copy protection and on what the display at the far end can accept, and that agreement is torn down and rebuilt every time an input changes, a device sleeps, or a receiver powers on. One display reporting its capabilities badly can drag an entire chain down to its level, or produce the classic symptom: everything works until you switch inputs, and then a screen goes black and stays black until things are power-cycled in the right order.

The fix is not luck and it is not a better cable. It is managing the negotiation at the matrix, so each output presents a stable and correct description of the display behind it; scaling where one run has a screen that cannot take what everything else can; and holding firmware across sources, matrix, receivers and displays at versions known to behave together. That last point is why a distributed system wants an owner. It is also the honest reason this is a bad category for a do-it-yourself install: the parts are purchasable and the behavior is not.

Long runs, old houses, and where the rack goes

Kansas City houses are the reason we default to structured cable rather than HDMI. Lots here are generous and the houses spread out on them: a walkout basement, a main level, an upper floor, and frequently a detached garage or pool house on the same system. The run from a basement rack to a third-floor bedroom, taken the way cable actually travels rather than the way it looks on a plan, is routinely long enough that the copper answer stops being an answer. Design for the real route, not the straight line.

The older stock on both sides of the line — Brookside, Mission Hills, the early Prairie Village streets — has the opposite constraint. Plaster over lath, framing that is not on modern spacing, masonry chimney breasts, and often no attic or basement above the wall you need. There, the route is the entire design problem and the display list gets shaped by what can actually be reached. We plan the route first and pick the transport second, and when a wall genuinely cannot be reached we say so rather than opening plaster we cannot close invisibly.

Where the rack lives matters more than clients expect, and it is the one thing that is expensive to change later. It needs conditioned air rather than a sealed closet, a dedicated circuit, room to get behind it, and a location that is not directly under a bedroom or against a shared wall, because equipment fans run all night. A rack relocation in Parkville earlier this year was exactly that job: the equipment was fine, the room it was in was wrong. Getting the location right at design time costs nothing.

The audio half, and the guest test

Distributed video projects go wrong at the sound more often than at the picture. Television audio has to reach whatever is actually going to play it — a soundbar, a receiver, or a pair of architectural speakers in the ceiling — stay in sync with the image, and hand over cleanly when the source changes. Where a room has real speakers we take the audio out at the rack and route it as its own signal rather than depending on the display to send it back down the cable, and the room gets tuned with the rest of the whole-house audio.

The last test is the only one that matters day to day. A guest picks up a remote or a phone in a room they have never been in, and gets a picture and sound without asking anybody. That is a control problem, and it is why source selection sits on the same Control4 or Crestron interface that runs the lighting and the shades rather than on a pile of vendor apps. Every install carries a five-year workmanship warranty, the equipment carries its manufacturer warranty, and you have our support for as long as you own the system.

Common questions